Holladay v. Akramkhodjaev, 2:19-cv-3410. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200113e18
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER SARAH D. MORRISON , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon consideration of a Report and Recommendation (R&R) issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 9, 2019 (ECF No. 21). In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff Carol Holladay's action as to the John Doe Defendants be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect timely service of process on those defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The time for filing objections has pa
Summary: ORDER SARAH D. MORRISON , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon consideration of a Report and Recommendation (R&R) issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 9, 2019 (ECF No. 21). In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff Carol Holladay's action as to the John Doe Defendants be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect timely service of process on those defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The time for filing objections has pas..
More
ORDER
SARAH D. MORRISON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon consideration of a Report and Recommendation (R&R) issued by the Magistrate Judge on December 9, 2019 (ECF No. 21). In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff Carol Holladay's action as to the John Doe Defendants be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect timely service of process on those defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The time for filing objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. For the reasons set forth in the R&R, the Court hereby ADOPTS the R&R (ECF No. 21) and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the Complaint only as to the John Doe Defendants.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
