GAINES v. COX, 2:11-cv-206-GMN-RJJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120531b63
Visitors: 13
Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default or Sanctions Against Defendant for Non Compliance F.R.C.P. 16.1 and 37 (#49). The Court having reviewed the Motion (#49) and the file herein, finds that on May 16, 2012, the Court granted the parties to and including May 31, 2012, to file a proposed, joint discovery plan and scheduling order. See, Order (#45). Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Mo
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default or Sanctions Against Defendant for Non Compliance F.R.C.P. 16.1 and 37 (#49). The Court having reviewed the Motion (#49) and the file herein, finds that on May 16, 2012, the Court granted the parties to and including May 31, 2012, to file a proposed, joint discovery plan and scheduling order. See, Order (#45). Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Mot..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. JOHNSTON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Default or Sanctions Against Defendant for Non Compliance F.R.C.P. 16.1 and 37 (#49).
The Court having reviewed the Motion (#49) and the file herein, finds that on May 16, 2012, the Court granted the parties to and including May 31, 2012, to file a proposed, joint discovery plan and scheduling order. See, Order (#45). Good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default or Sanctions Against Defendant for Non Compliance F.R.C.P. 16.1 and 37 (#49) is DENIED as premature.
Source: Leagle
