Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mitchell v. Flores, 2:16-cv-00037-RFB-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181119563 Visitors: 35
Filed: Nov. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2018
Summary: DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Miguel Flores-Nava, by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, and Jared M. Frost, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby requests an additional thirty (30) days to file a Stipulation and Proposed Order of Dismissal. Defendant's Motion is made and based on Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the follow
More

DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Defendant Miguel Flores-Nava, by and through counsel, Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General for the State of Nevada, and Jared M. Frost, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby requests an additional thirty (30) days to file a Stipulation and Proposed Order of Dismissal. Defendant's Motion is made and based on Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the following memorandum of points and authorities, the pleadings and papers on file, and any other evidence the Court deems appropriate to consider.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A), the Court may extend the time to perform an act within a specified time for good cause shown.

On October 10, 2018, the parties participated in a settlement conference at which a settlement was reached to resolve this matter in its entirety. See ECF No. 92. At the conclusion of the conference, the Court ordered the parties to file a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal by November 7, 2018. Id.

On October 17, 2018, the undersigned mailed Plaintiff a proposed settlement agreement and a proposed Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice for his review and signature. As of the date of this filing, the undersigned has not received a response. Therefore, additional time is needed to communicate with Plaintiff in an effort to determine the cause of the delay and to attempt to resolve any disagreements. For these reasons, Defendants submit there is good cause to extend the time file the stipulation and proposed order for an additional thirty (30) days, or until December 7, 2018.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties shall have until December 7, 2018, to file a stipulation and proposed order for dismissal.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer