Filed: Aug. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: 08-0841-ag ABC, Inc., et al. v. Federal Communications Commission UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE
Summary: 08-0841-ag ABC, Inc., et al. v. Federal Communications Commission UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE ..
More
08-0841-ag
ABC, Inc., et al. v. Federal Communications Commission
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
SUMMARY ORDER
RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A
SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED
BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1.
WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY
MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE
NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY
OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL.
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel
Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of New York, on the 1st
day of August, two thousand twelve.
PRESENT: RICHARD C. WESLEY,
DEBRA A. LIVINGSTON,
Circuit Judges,
JANE A. RESTANI,*
Judge.
______________________________
ABC, INC., KTRK TELEVISION, INC., WLS TELEVISION, INC., CITADEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,
WKRN, G.P., YOUNG BROADCASTING OF GREEN BAY, INC., WKOW TELEVISION, INC., WSIL-
TV, INC., ABC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOCIATION, CEDAR RAPIDS TELEVISION COMPANY,
CENTEX TELEVISION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, CHANNEL 12 OF BEAUMONT INCORPORATED,
DUHAMEL BROADCASTING ENTERPRISES, GRAY TELEVISION LICENSE, INCORPORATED, KATC
COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, KATV LLC, KDNL LICENSEE LLC, KETV HEARST-
ARGYLE TELEVISION INCORPORATED, KLTV/KTRE LICENSE SUBSIDIARY LLC, KSTP-TV LLC,
KSWO TELEVISION COMPANY INCORPORATED, KTBS INCORPORATED, KTUL LLC, KVUE
TELEVISION INCORPORATED, MCGRAW-HILL BROADCASTING COMPANY INCORPORATED, MEDIA
GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LLC, MISSION BROADCASTING INCORPORATED,
MISSISSIPPI BROADCASTING PARTNERS, NEW YORK TIMES MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NEXSTAR
BROADCASTING INCORPORATED, NPG OF TEXAS, L.P., OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST-ARGYLE
TELEVISION INC., PIEDMONT TELEVISION OF HUNTSVILLE LICENSE LLC, PIEDMONT TELEVISION
OF SPRINGFIELD LICENSE LLC, POLLACK/BELZ COMMUNICATION COMPANY, INC., POST-
NEWSWEEK STATIONS SAN ANTONIO INC., SCRIPPS HOWARD BROADCASTING CO., SOUTHERN
BROADCASTING INC., TENNESSEE BROADCASTING PARTNERS, TRIBUNE TELEVISION NEW
*
The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge of the United States Court of International
Trade, sitting by designation.
ORLEANS INC., WAPT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION INC., WDIO-TV LLC, WEAR LICENSEE
LLC, WFAA-TV INC., WISN HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION INC.,
Petitioners,
v. Nos. 08-0841-ag (L), 08-1424-ag (CON),
08-1781-ag (CON), 08-1966-ag (CON)
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents,
FOX TELEVISION STATIONS, INC., NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., NBC TELEMUNDO LICENSE CO., CBS
BROADCASTING INC.,
Intervenors.
______________________________
FOR PETITIONERS: SETH P. WAXMAN (Paul R.Q. Wolfson, Jack N. Goodman,
Daniel S. Volchok, and Micah S. Myers, on the brief), Wilmer
Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, Washington, DC; John W.
Zucker, Alan N. Braverman, and Susan L. Fox, ABC, Inc., New
York, NY, for Petitioners ABC, Inc., KTRK Television, Inc., and
WLS Television, Inc.
Wade H. Hargrove, Mark J. Prak, and David Kushner (Stephen
Hartzell and Julia C. Ambrose, on the brief), Brooks, Pierce,
McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP, Raleigh, NC, for
Petitioners Citadel Communications, LLC, WKRN, G.P., Young
Broadcasting of Green Bay, Inc., WKOW Television Inc., WSIL-
TV, Inc., ABC Television Affiliates Association, Cedar Rapids
Television Company, Centex Television Limited Partnership,
Channel 12 of Beaumont Incorporated, Duhamel Broadcasting
Enterprises, Gray Television License, Incorporated, KATC
Communications, Incorporated, KATV LLC, KDNL Licensee
LLC, KETV Hearst-Argyle Television Incorporated, KLTV/KTRE
License Subsidiary LLC, KSTP-TV LLC, KSWO Television
Company Incorporated, KTBS Incorporated, KTUL LLC, KVUE
Television Incorporated, McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Company
Incorporated, Media General Communications Holdings LLC,
Mission Broadcasting Incorporated, Mississippi Broadcasting
Partners, New York Times Management Services, Nexstar
Broadcasting Incorporated, NPG of Texas, L.P., Ohio/Oklahoma
Hearst-Argyle Television Inc., Piedmont Television of Huntsville
License LLC, Piedmont Television of Springfield License LLC,
Pollack/Belz Communication Company, Inc., Post-Newsweek
Stations San Antonio Inc., Scripps Howard Broadcasting Co.,
2
Southern Broadcasting Inc., Tennessee Broadcasting Partners,
Tribune Television New Orleans Inc., WAPT Hearst-Argyle
Television Inc., WDIO-TV LLC, WEAR Licensee LLC, WFAA-
TV Inc., and WISN Hearst-Argyle Television Inc.
Andrew J. Schwartzman and Parul P. Desai, Media Access Project,
Washington, DC, for Amici Curiae Center for Creative Voices in
Media and Future of Music Coalition, in support of Petitioners.
FOR RESPONDENTS: SEAN LEV, General Counsel,** (Jacob M. Lewis, Acting Deputy
General Counsel, and Nadan M. Joshi, Counsel, on the brief),
Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, for
Respondent Federal Communications Commission.
Stuart Delery, Assistant Attorney General,*** (Thomas M. Bondy
and Anne Murphy, on the brief), U.S. Department of Justice, Civil
Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent United States of
America.
Thomas B. North, Law Office of Thomas B. North, St. Ignace, MI,
for Amicus Curiae Decency Enforcement Center for Television, in
support of Respondents.
Robert W. Peters and Robin S. Whitehead, Morality in Media,
Inc., New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae Morality in Media, Inc.,
in support of Respondents.
Christopher T. Craig and Robert R. Sparks, Sparks & Craig, LLP,
McLean, VA, for Amicus Curiae Parents Television Council, in
support of Respondents.
FOR INTERVENORS: Carter G. Phillips, R. Clark Wadlow, James P. Young, Jennifer
Tatel, David S. Petron, Mark Schneider, and Quin M. Sorenson,
Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC; Ellen S. Agress, Maureen A.
O’Connell, Fox Television Stations, Inc., New York, NY, for
Intervenor Fox Television Stations, Inc.
**
Sean Lev is substituted for Austin C. Schlick, who was substituted for Matthew B.
Berry, who briefed and argued this case, as counsel for Respondent Federal Communications
Commission.
***
Stuart Delery is substituted for Tony West, who was substituted for Gregory G.
Katsas, who briefed this case, as counsel for Respondent United States of America.
3
Miguel A. Estrada, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington,
DC; Susan E. Weiner, NBC Universal, Inc., New York, NY, for
Intervenors NBC Universal, Inc. and NBC Telemundo License Co.
Robert Corn-Revere, Ronald G. London, Amber L. Husbands, and
David M. Shapiro, Davis Wright & Tremaine LLP, Washington,
DC; Jonathan H. Anschell, CBS Broadcasting, Inc., Los Angeles,
CA; Susanna M. Lowy, CBS Broadcasting, Inc., New York, NY,
for Intervenor CBS Broadcasting Inc.
______________________________
On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, following a petition for review
of a forfeiture order by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), reversal of the
Commission’s order by opinion, ABC, Inc. v. FCC, 404 F. App’x 530 (2d Cir. 2011), and a
petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States.
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
DECREED that the petition for review is GRANTED and the forfeiture order of the FCC is
VACATED.
Petitioners ABC, Inc., ABC Television Affiliates Association, and ABC-affiliated
television stations (collectively “ABC”) petitioned for review of a forfeiture order against forty-
four ABC-affiliated television stations after the FCC determined that the display of a woman’s
nude buttocks in an episode of NYPD Blue was actionably indecent. See In re Complaints
Against Various Television Licensees Concerning Their February 25, 2003 Broadcast of the
Program “NYPD Blue”, 23 FCC Rcd. 3147 (2008). We followed Fox Television Stations, Inc.
v. FCC,
613 F.3d 317, 335 (2d Cir. 2010) (rehearing en banc denied), which held that the
indecency policy under which the forfeiture order was issued was unconstitutionally vague. We
therefore granted the petition for review and vacated the FCC’s forfeiture order. See ABC, 404
4
F. App’x at 533. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and vacated our decision.
The Supreme Court determined that the FCC’s forfeiture order should be set aside
because the Commission failed to give ABC fair notice under the Fifth Amendment’s Due
Process Clause, prior to the broadcast of the episode of NYPD Blue in question, that fleeting
nudity could be found actionably indecent. See FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.,
567 U.S.
___,
132 S. Ct. 2307, 2320 (2012). Based on the Supreme Court’s decision in FCC v. Fox
Television Stations, Inc., we GRANT the petition for review and VACATE the FCC’s forfeiture
order.
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk
5