U.S. v. ROBERTS, 4:15-CR-00003-F-1. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150311c02
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant John Roberts's Motion to Continue Arraignment and Trial [DE-18], and Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [DE-17], and on the United States' Motion for Defendant to Secure Counsel or Request Court Appointed Counsel [DE-14]. For good cause shown, and without objection from the government, the Defendant's motions are ALLOWED. Arraignment in this matter, previously scheduled for the court
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX , Senior District Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant John Roberts's Motion to Continue Arraignment and Trial [DE-18], and Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [DE-17], and on the United States' Motion for Defendant to Secure Counsel or Request Court Appointed Counsel [DE-14]. For good cause shown, and without objection from the government, the Defendant's motions are ALLOWED. Arraignment in this matter, previously scheduled for the court'..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant John Roberts's Motion to Continue Arraignment and Trial [DE-18], and Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions [DE-17], and on the United States' Motion for Defendant to Secure Counsel or Request Court Appointed Counsel [DE-14]. For good cause shown, and without objection from the government, the Defendant's motions are ALLOWED. Arraignment in this matter, previously scheduled for the court's March 30,2015 term of court, is hereby CONTINUED until the court's June 1, 2015 term. It is further ORDERED that the defendant's pretrial motions be filed no later than May 15, 2015, and responses thereto be filed no later than May 29, 2015.
As to the United States' motion, a review of the record reveals that attorney Kelly Latham Greene entered a Notice of Appearance [DE-15] on March 3, 2015. Consequently, the United States' Motion for Defendant to Secure Counsel or Request Court Appointed Counsel [DE-14] is DISMISSED as moot.
Because the court finds that the ends of justice served by this motion outweigh the best interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial, such period of delay resulting from this continuance shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
