Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. BARRINGTON, 15-7307. (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: infco20151222150 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2015
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Samuel Lee Barrington appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2012) motion. The district court granted a certificate of appealability on one issue: whether Barrington was entitled to resentencing following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Johnson , 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). We have reviewed the
More

UNPUBLISHED

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Samuel Lee Barrington appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The district court granted a certificate of appealability on one issue: whether Barrington was entitled to resentencing following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Johnson, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barrington, Nos. 1:12-cr-00197-CCE-1; 1:13-cv-00510-CCE-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 31, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer