SHAREEF v. DONAHUE, 3:11-CV-615-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120731871
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the parties "Joint Motion For Privacy Act Order" (Document No. 27) filed July 25, 2012. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and the applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties "Joint Motion For Privacy Ac
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the parties "Joint Motion For Privacy Act Order" (Document No. 27) filed July 25, 2012. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and the applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties "Joint Motion For Privacy Act..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the parties "Joint Motion For Privacy Act Order" (Document No. 27) filed July 25, 2012. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and the applicable authority, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties "Joint Motion For Privacy Act Order" (Document No. 27) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle