EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr., District Judge.
Counsel shall carefully read this Order, note the deadlines set forth in the Schedule Summary below and in the body of this Order, and adhere to it.
This matter is set for a Final Pretrial Conference and Trial. Voir dire will begin on the morning of the date set for trial, with the trial immediately following.
The Court
The Court uses a trailing docket, setting three to five civil cases to begin on the same day. Cases are tried in the order they were filed. If a case set for the same day goes to trial, then the parties and counsel in the next case shall remain prepared to go to trial on a standby basis for a period of two weeks unless the Court orders otherwise.
Under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174, and Fed. R. Crim. P. 50(a), the Court will give preference to any criminal matters it has set to take place the same time as the trial in this case.
This case has been set for a Settlement Conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a)(5) and (c)(2)(I) before The Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., United States District Court, 85 Marconi Boulevard, Room 301, Columbus, Ohio 43215.
Counsel and the parties shall adhere to the following with respect to the settlement conference:
(1) The trial attorney for each party must attend the conference.
(2) The parties or principals with settlement authority shall be present. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c)(1). In rare instances, the Court may permit a party to be available by telephone.
(3) Lack of discovery or settlement authority will not excuse active participation in the conference.
(4) No later than
(5) No later than
(6) No later than
(7) Before the conference counsel shall discuss with their clients whether this case would be appropriate for alternative dispute resolution. S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 16.3.
Any questions regarding the settlement conference should be addressed to the Court's Law Clerks, Penny Barrick or Courter Shimeall, at (614) 719-3240.
The parties shall comply fully with all of the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), including the required disclosures at least
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(A), the parties shall submit to the Court, and serve on opposing counsel, the names, addresses and occupations of all witnesses they intend to call at trial, with a
The witness lists shall comport with all of the requirements of Rule 26(a)(3)(A).
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(B), the parties shall submit to the Court, and serve on opposing counsel, the designations of any portions of depositions they intend to offer as evidence at trial.
The parties shall mark their documentary or physical evidence in advance of trial. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)(A)(iii), each party shall exchange and file a list containing a brief description of each item of documentary or physical proof the party intends to offer in evidence as an exhibit at trial. The exhibit lists shall comport with all of the requirements of Rule 26(a)(3)(A).
The parties shall attempt to agree to the authenticity and admissibility of documents. Those documents the parties agree should be presented to the jury shall be marked as Joint Exhibits.
The Court strongly encourages the parties to utilize the electronic courtroom technology for presentation of evidence. The parties shall report to the Court, by joint submission, on or before the date of the Settlement Conference, their intent to use the technology.
In all cases, the parties are required to submit only one (1) copy of exhibits in a three-ringed tabbed notebook. The notebook shall be delivered to the Courtroom Deputy, Mr. Andy F. Quisumbing, two (2) days before the trial. The parties are also required to provide one (1) copy of their exhibits to opposing counsel. If the parties are not utilizing the Court's complete electronic technology, they shall present their exhibits by using the document cameras (ELMO) located at counsel tables.
Counsel for the parties shall make any and all stipulations pursuant to the Federal Rules.
A party's motions in limine and memoranda in support shall not exceed a total of ten (10) pages in length. The memoranda contra shall not exceed a total of ten (10) pages in length. The Court will not accept any reply memoranda.
The Court will prepare
All instructions shall be concise, understandable and neutral. Further, counsel shall at a minimum
The parties shall submit a joint proposed final pretrial order, using the attached form. The parties may submit their joint proposed final pretrial order to Chambers or attach it to an e-mail directed to Sargus_Chambers@ohsd.uscourts.gov.
The Court does not require the parties to file trial briefs in this case.
The following rules shall apply to all papers filed with the Court in this case, including pretrial motions and supplemental jury instructions. On issues of federal law the Court strongly prefers that the parties cite only: the United States Constitution; United States statutes (including the Federal Rules), treaties, or regulations; decisions by the United States Supreme Court; or decisions by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The Court strongly prefers the citation of non-binding federal authorities
On issues of Ohio law, the Court strongly prefers that the parties shall cite only: the Ohio Constitution; the Ohio Revised Code; decisions by the Ohio Supreme Court; decisions by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals construing Ohio law; or, if no binding authorities are available, published decisions by Ohio courts of appeal. The parties should cite other non-binding authorities only if there are no Ohio authorities on point. If there are binding authorities on point, but counsel nevertheless feels that due diligence requires citation of non-binding authorities, then counsel shall cite the non-binding authorities only in an appendix of supplemental authorities, with a parenthetical explanation for each such cite.
The Court encourages the parties to submit on a CD: (1) all proposed jury instructions; (2) all potentially case-dispositive motions, as well as the memoranda in support of and in opposition to such motions; and (3) any memoranda that exceeds five pages in length. The parties may submit such disks directly to chambers in care of the Court's law clerks.
The whole panel of prospective jurors (i.e. those in the jury box and those seated in the rear of the courtroom) will be examined collectively. The Judge will conduct most of the voir dire examination. The Court will allow counsel to follow-up on the Court's examination. Fed. R. Civ. P. 47(a).
After voir dire the Court will conduct a hearing to consider challenges for cause and peremptory challenges. Each prospective juror is assigned a number by the Clerk's Office. A list of the jurors' names and numbers is available to counsel prior to the commencement of trial. When challenging a juror, counsel should refer to the juror by name and number.
Counsel will not be permitted to question jurors individually regarding background information. This information is contained in juror questionnaires which are on file in the Clerk's Office. Counsel should examine these forms prior to the commencement of trial. Counsel should contact the Jury Deputy, Frances Green, (614) 719-3020, to obtain information about the availability of juror questionnaires.
The United States Magistrate Judge may conduct voir dire if other matters require the District Judge's immediate attention.
The entire panel shall be challenged for cause.
Each party shall be entitled to three (3) peremptory challenges. 28 U.S.C. § 1870. The parties will exercise their peremptory challenges alternately with the plaintiff exercising the first challenge. If either party "passes," that challenge will be counted as used. Peremptory challenges will be directed to the entire jury panel.
In most civil cases the Court will seat a jury of eight (8) members. In accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 48, all jurors shall participate in the verdict unless excused pursuant to Rule 47(c). Unless the parties otherwise stipulate, the verdict shall be unanimous and no verdict shall be taken from a jury reduced in size to fewer than six (6) members.
Counsel shall adhere to the following guidelines:
1. Five to six hours of
2. The parties must raise all legal issues in advance of trial. The Court will not consider issues raised during the trial unless counsel shows that the matter could not have been raised sooner by the exercise of due diligence.
3. The Court strongly prefers not to interrupt the presentation of evidence to the jury to hold bench or chambers conferences.
4. If counsel makes an objection during the presentation of evidence to the jury, the Court may order examining counsel to proceed to other matters or call a different witness. The Court will then rule on the objection at a more convenient time.
5. Counsel shall inform the Court's law clerk if they wish to take a matter up with the Court during a break or recess.
After consultation with counsel, the Court may limit expert testimony, direct a party or parties to present evidence on a particular issue early in the trial, or establish limits for the presentation of all evidence. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c)(2); see also Fed. R. Evid. 611(a).
The Court may order bifurcation of liability and damages in complex cases. Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b).
The parties and counsel shall comply fully and literally with this pre-trial order. The Court will consider the imposition of appropriate sanctions in the event of non-compliance, including monetary sanctions, the dismissal of claims or defenses, or the exclusion of evidence. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f).
If the parties believe that mediation will be helpful at any time during the pendency of this action, please inform the Court. Unless otherwise requested by the parties, the Court will assign a Magistrate Judge who is not assigned to this action to mediate it.
This order supersedes all previous orders in this case to the extent previous orders are inconsistent with this order.
The parties shall address questions about this order to the Court's Law Clerks, Penny Barrick or Courter Shimeall, (614) 719-3240, by way of a telephone conference with counsel for all parties participating, or with fewer than all counsel participating with express permission of non-participating counsel.