Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Roche v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:17-cv-177. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio Number: infdco20171220g06 Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2017
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER [Resolving Doc. 1 ] JAMES S. GWIN , District Judge . Plaintiff Justin Roche originally applied in December 2013 for supplemental security income and Child's Insurance Benefits on the basis of disability. 1 An Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") heard Roche's case at a December 8, 2015, hearing, and found Roche not disabled in a February 2, 2016 decision. 2 The Appeals Council denied Roche's request for review, and Roche brought this action to challenge the Social Securit
More

OPINION AND ORDER

[Resolving Doc. 1]

Plaintiff Justin Roche originally applied in December 2013 for supplemental security income and Child's Insurance Benefits on the basis of disability.1

An Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") heard Roche's case at a December 8, 2015, hearing, and found Roche not disabled in a February 2, 2016 decision.2 The Appeals Council denied Roche's request for review, and Roche brought this action to challenge the Social Security Commissioner's final decision.3

Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg originally considered this case. On December 12, 2017, Magistrate Judge Greenberg issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the final decision of the Commissioner be vacated and remanded.4

The Commissioner does not object to the Report and Recommendation.5

The Federal Magistrates Act requires a district court to conduct a de novo review only of those portions of a Report and Recommendation to which the parties have made an objection.6 Absent objection, a district court may adopt the Report and Recommendation without review.7

Because no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation, this Court may adopt the Report and Recommendation without further review. Moreover, having conducted its own review of the briefing and record, the Court agrees with the conclusions in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Greenberg's Report and Recommendation and incorporates it fully herein by reference. The Court VACATES the final decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this case for further proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Greenberg's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. See Doc. 13 at 2.
2. Id.
3. Id.
4. Id. at 1.
5. See Doc. 14.
6. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
7. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); L.R. 72.3(b).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer