Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Carroll v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, 2:17-cv-380. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20180316e84 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM , District Judge . On February 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be dismissed. Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6). Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED
More

ORDER

On February 20, 2018, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed. Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6). Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

The parties have waived their right to appeal from the judgment entered in this action by virtue of their failure to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Under these circumstances, the Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer