U.S. v. THOMAS, 12-7187. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130611104
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Myron Douglas Thomas appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas , No. 7:06-cr-00083-FL-3 (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Myron Douglas Thomas appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas , No. 7:06-cr-00083-FL-3 (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Myron Douglas Thomas appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. 7:06-cr-00083-FL-3 (E.D.N.C. July 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
