TEAGUE v. ASTRUE, 1:11cv198. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120522a00
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 18, 2012
Latest Update: May 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 11]; the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 13]; the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 15] regarding the disposition of those motions; and the Plaintiff's Objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 16]. After careful consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 15] and the Plaintiff's Objections there
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 11]; the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 13]; the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 15] regarding the disposition of those motions; and the Plaintiff's Objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 16]. After careful consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 15] and the Plaintiff's Objections theret..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 11]; the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 13]; the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 15] regarding the disposition of those motions; and the Plaintiff's Objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 16].
After careful consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 15] and the Plaintiff's Objections thereto [Doc. 16], the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings of fact are correct and that his proposed conclusions of law are consistent with current case law. Accordingly, the Court hereby overrules the Plaintiff's Objections and accepts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation that the Commissioner's decision in this case be affirmed.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Objections to the Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 16] are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation [Doc. 15] is hereby ACCEPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum and Recommendation, the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 13] is GRANTED; the Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Doc. 11] is DENIED; and the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. This case is hereby DISMISSED. A judgment shall be entered simultaneously herewith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
