Brunelle v. Fontana Village, Inc., 1:18-cv-00227-MR-WCM. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190211b87
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Tennessee Valley Authority's Unopposed Motion to Strike Jury Demand [Doc. 27]. The Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff Tennessee Valley Authority ("TVA") moves to strike the jury demand set forth in the Plaintiff's Complaint on the grounds that no right of trial by jury exists against TVA in this action under the Constitution or statutes of the United States. [Doc. 27]. The Plaintiff and the Defendant/Cross-Defendant Font
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Tennessee Valley Authority's Unopposed Motion to Strike Jury Demand [Doc. 27]. The Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff Tennessee Valley Authority ("TVA") moves to strike the jury demand set forth in the Plaintiff's Complaint on the grounds that no right of trial by jury exists against TVA in this action under the Constitution or statutes of the United States. [Doc. 27]. The Plaintiff and the Defendant/Cross-Defendant Fonta..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Tennessee Valley Authority's Unopposed Motion to Strike Jury Demand [Doc. 27].
The Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff Tennessee Valley Authority ("TVA") moves to strike the jury demand set forth in the Plaintiff's Complaint on the grounds that no right of trial by jury exists against TVA in this action under the Constitution or statutes of the United States. [Doc. 27]. The Plaintiff and the Defendant/Cross-Defendant Fontana Village, Inc. have no objections to TVA's Motion.
For the reasons stated in TVA's Motion, and for cause shown,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that TVA's Unopposed Motion to Strike Jury Demand [Doc. 27] is GRANTED, and the Plaintiff's demand for a jury trial as to TVA is hereby STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
