Simply Snackin, Inc. v. S-L Distribution Company, Inc., 1:17-CV-0381. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20171207e44
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO , District Judge . In accordance with the accompanying memorandum of law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim (Doc. 52) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1) The motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to Counts I and II as stated against Defendant Snyder's-Lance; 2) The motion is DENIED as to Counts I and II as stated against Defendant S-L Distributors; 3) The motion is GRANTE
Summary: ORDER SYLVIA H. RAMBO , District Judge . In accordance with the accompanying memorandum of law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim (Doc. 52) is granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1) The motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to Counts I and II as stated against Defendant Snyder's-Lance; 2) The motion is DENIED as to Counts I and II as stated against Defendant S-L Distributors; 3) The motion is GRANTED..
More
ORDER
SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge.
In accordance with the accompanying memorandum of law, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim (Doc. 52) is granted in part and denied in part as follows:
1) The motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to Counts I and II as stated against Defendant Snyder's-Lance;
2) The motion is DENIED as to Counts I and II as stated against Defendant S-L Distributors;
3) The motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to Counts III and IV as stated against Defendant S-L Distributors, and without prejudice as to Defendant Snyder's-Lance.
4) The motion is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to all claims brought by Plaintiff Jason Isanberg.
Source: Leagle
