Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. MOORE, 5:95CR00205-001 (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20150602764 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 28, 2015
Latest Update: May 28, 2015
Summary: CONSENT ORDER FOR INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS 28 U.S.C., 3204 JAMES C. FOX , District Judge . The parties, the United States of America, and the judgment defendant, agree and stipulate as follows: 1. The judgment defendant, social security number, and address are: Ronnie Eugene Moore; xxx-xx-7403; and Raleigh, North Carolina. 2. A Judgment was entered against the judgment defendant, in this action on July 20, 1993. The total balance due on the Judgment is $27,398.63 as of May 27, 2015. 3. The
More

CONSENT ORDER FOR INSTALLMENT PAYMENTS 28 U.S.C., § 3204

The parties, the United States of America, and the judgment defendant, agree and stipulate as follows:

1. The judgment defendant, social security number, and address are: Ronnie Eugene Moore; xxx-xx-7403; and Raleigh, North Carolina.

2. A Judgment was entered against the judgment defendant, in this action on July 20, 1993. The total balance due on the Judgment is $27,398.63 as of May 27, 2015.

3. The judgment defendant waives services of Notice of the Application for this Order of payment pursuant to the Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act of 1990 (FDCPA) and any other process to which the judgment defendant may be entitled under the FDCPA.

4. The parties therefore agree and stipulate to the entry of this Consent Order for Installment Payments against the judgment defendant. It is expressly agreed and stipulated to by the parties that the defendant shall pay to the United States the total sum of $100.00 per month, beginning on July 5, 2015. Said monthly payments shall begin on July 5, 2015 and will be due on the 5th of each month thereafter until March 5, 2017 when payments will increase to $400.00 a month and continue until debt is paid in full. Checks should be made payable to:

U. S. District Court and mailed to:

P. 0. Box 25670 Raleigh, North Carolina 27611

5. Nothing in this agreement prevents the plaintiff from pursuing administrative offsets, including that by Internal Revenue Service, and the judgment defendant specifically consents to the offset. Any payments applied to this claim as a result of an offset will be credited as a payment to the existing balance and will not be included as part of the periodic payments, nor will it affect the periodic payments.

6. The judgment defendant hereby knowingly waives any rights that he may have to any automatic accounting. In the event the above recovery is not sufficient to pay the debt in full, the U.S. shall be entitled to pursue any and all remedies to collect such debt as are allowed by law.

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer