Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY J. HELMICK , District Judge . Before me is the August 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert, recommending I affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the application of Plaintiff Tina Louise Theis for Supplemental Security Income. (Doc. No. 16). Under federal law, "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as pro
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY J. HELMICK , District Judge . Before me is the August 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert, recommending I affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the application of Plaintiff Tina Louise Theis for Supplemental Security Income. (Doc. No. 16). Under federal law, "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as prov..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY J. HELMICK, District Judge.
Before me is the August 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert, recommending I affirm the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying the application of Plaintiff Tina Louise Theis for Supplemental Security Income. (Doc. No. 16).
Under federal law, "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981). In this case, the fourteen-day period has elapsed and no objections have been filed.
The failure to file written objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation constitutes a waiver of a determination by the district court of an issue covered in the Report and Recommendation. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); see also Walters, 638 F.2d at 950 (6th Cir. 1981); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987) ("only those specific objections to the magistrate's report made to the district court will be preserved for appellate review").
Following review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, I adopt the Report and Recommendation, (Doc. No. 16), in its entirety as the Order of the Court, and affirm the Commissioner's decision.
So Ordered.
