DUNCAN v. SMITH, 1:12CV793. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20130910d23
Visitors: 32
Filed: Sep. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 09, 2013
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge. On July 31, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted. IT IS T
Summary: ORDER JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge. On July 31, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted. IT IS TH..
More
ORDER
JAMES A. BEATY, Jr., District Judge.
On July 31, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.
The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #14] is GRANTED, that Defendant Hassan's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #17] is GRANTED, and that this case is DISMISSED. A Judgment will be entered contemporaneously herewith.
Source: Leagle
