Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CHERRY v. DUKE, 134 A.D.3d 662 (2015)

Court: Supreme Court of New York Number: innyco20151202268 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2015
Summary: Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. On a CPLR 3211 (a) motion to dismiss, "affidavits may be used freely to preserve inartfully pleaded, but potentially meritorious, claims" ( Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 N.Y.2d 633 , 635 [1976]; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. Bank & Trust Co., 5 N.Y.3d 582 , 591 [2005]). Accepting as true the facts pleaded in the complaint, as amplified by the plaintiff's affidavit, and according the plaintiff "the benefit of every poss
More

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On a CPLR 3211 (a) motion to dismiss, "affidavits may be used freely to preserve inartfully pleaded, but potentially meritorious, claims" (Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 N.Y.2d 633, 635 [1976]; see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. Bank & Trust Co., 5 N.Y.3d 582, 591 [2005]).

Accepting as true the facts pleaded in the complaint, as amplified by the plaintiff's affidavit, and according the plaintiff "the benefit of every possible favorable inference" (Leon v Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 87 [1994]), we find that the Supreme Court properly denied the appellants' pre-answer motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer