Littlejohn v. U.S., 3:06-cr-163-FDW-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190326c16
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government's motion, requesting that the Court continue holding this action in abeyance, pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Davis , No. 18-431 (pet'n granted Jan. 4, 2019). (Doc. No. 6). According to the Government's motion, counsel for Petitioner does not object to its request. ( Id. ). Based on the reasons given by the Government, and without objection by Petit
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government's motion, requesting that the Court continue holding this action in abeyance, pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Davis , No. 18-431 (pet'n granted Jan. 4, 2019). (Doc. No. 6). According to the Government's motion, counsel for Petitioner does not object to its request. ( Id. ). Based on the reasons given by the Government, and without objection by Petiti..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Government's motion, requesting that the Court continue holding this action in abeyance, pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Davis, No. 18-431 (pet'n granted Jan. 4, 2019). (Doc. No. 6). According to the Government's motion, counsel for Petitioner does not object to its request. (Id.).
Based on the reasons given by the Government, and without objection by Petitioner, the Court concludes that the motion should be granted.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Government's motion to continue holding this case in abeyance, (Doc. No. 6), is hereby GRANTED and this matter is hereby held in abeyance pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Davis, No. 18-431 (pet'n granted Jan. 4, 2019). Thereafter, the Government shall have 60 days from the date the Supreme Court issues its decision in Davis in which to respond to Petitioner's motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
