ORDER

KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge.

This habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court on petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file an answer (Doc. 6),1 motions to appoint counsel (Doc. 7, 16, 19), motions for hearing (Doc. 15, 25), motion to subpoena records (Doc. 23), motion to hold Miami Correctional account office and person[ne]l in contempt of court (Doc. 28), and "motion for leave of Court to attach records and exhibits showing count [5 & 7, 6 & 8] are to be dismissed for insufficiency of the evidence and could not hold to a felony level after the first appeal had vacated counts 1, 2, 3, 5, 7." (Doc. 27). Also before the Court is respondent's motion to file an additional citation. (Doc. 29).

In petitioner's motion to hold Miami Correctional account office and personnel in contempt of court, petitioner claims that his prisoner account has been overdrawn on several occasions, including one withdrawal of $73.06. (See Doc. 28 at PageID 1056). However, the full filing fee is this matter is $5.00 and the Court has not received any funds from petitioner in connection with this case. Petitioner has filed a similar motion in his prisoner civil rights action also filed in this Court, alleging that Miami Correctional Facility overdrew from his account. See Mockbee v. Scioto County Adult Parole Auth., Case No. 1:17-cv-254 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 2, 2018) (Dlott, J.; Litkovitz, M.J.) (Doc. 18).2 The Court will rule on petitioner's motion in that case. However, because it does not appear that any funds have been withdrawn from petitioner's account in connection with this case, his motion (Doc. 28) is DENIED.

In a separate Report and Recommendation issued this date, the undersigned has recommended that petitioner's habeas corpus petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The above motions that remain pending (Doc. 6, 7, 15, 16, 19, 23, 25, 27, 29) are therefore DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.