THOMAS v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 1:13-cv-919. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140819a51
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge. This prose habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is before the Court on respondent's motion to strike petitioner's objection to respondent's motion to dismiss. (Doc. 14). In a separate Report and Recommendation issued this date, the undersigned has recommended that petitioner's habeas corpus petition (Doc. 1) be dismissed with prejudice. Respondent's motion (Doc. 14) is therefore DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
KAREN L. LITKOVITZ, Magistrate Judge.
This prose habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court on respondent's motion to strike petitioner's objection to respondent's motion to dismiss. (Doc. 14). In a separate Report and Recommendation issued this date, the undersigned has recommended that petitioner's habeas corpus petition (Doc. 1) be dismissed with prejudice.
Respondent's motion (Doc. 14) is therefore DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
