Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WILSON v. WARDEN, LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 3:13-cv-217. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20151119875 Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TIMOTHY S. BLACK , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 33), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, and for good cause shown upon the Court's de novo review, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommend
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 33), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, and for good cause shown upon the Court's de novo review, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer