Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Szymborski v. City of North Las Vegas, 2:19-cv-00335-JAD-VCF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190418d97 Visitors: 36
Filed: Apr. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 16, 2019
Summary: Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 15] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Lee Edward Szymborski moves for a 30-day extension of his deadline to respond to the defendants' motion to dismiss. 1 Because plaintiff has demonstrated that he has had difficulty receiving his mail due to an event that occurred on April 7, 2019, and represents that he has not yet received a copy of the motion to dismiss, and defendant's certificate of service [ECF
More

Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss

[ECF No. 15]

Plaintiff Lee Edward Szymborski moves for a 30-day extension of his deadline to respond to the defendants' motion to dismiss.1 Because plaintiff has demonstrated that he has had difficulty receiving his mail due to an event that occurred on April 7, 2019, and represents that he has not yet received a copy of the motion to dismiss, and defendant's certificate of service [ECF No. 17] reflects that a copy of that motion was mailed to plaintiff yesterday, I find good cause for the extension and grant it.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to extend time [ECF No. 15] is GRANTED; Szmborski's deadline to respond to the motion to dismiss [ECF No. 9] is extended to May 22, 2019.

FootNotes


1. ECF No. 9 (motion to dismiss); ECF No. 15 (motion to extend time).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer