PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC v. MARIANI, 1:14cv663. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150722d65
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 16, 2015 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23). Subsequently, defendant Harry Carr filed objections to such Report and Recommendati
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 16, 2015 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23). Subsequently, defendant Harry Carr filed objections to such Report and Recommendatio..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 16, 2015 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23). Subsequently, defendant Harry Carr filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) and plaintiff filed a response to the objections (Doc. 27).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendant Harry Carr's motion to dismiss (Doc. 16) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
