Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thorne v. U.S., 3:13-cr-293-MOC-1. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20190423b36 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2019
Summary: SUPPLEMENTAL 60-DAY ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Amend his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. 2255, (Doc. 7), and Response addressing timeliness, (Doc. No. 10). Upon consideration of the Motion to Amend, Petitioner's Response addressing timeliness, and the record of prior proceedings, the Court determines that the United States Attorney should file a re
More

SUPPLEMENTAL 60-DAY ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion to Amend his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, (Doc. 7), and Response addressing timeliness, (Doc. No. 10).

Upon consideration of the Motion to Amend, Petitioner's Response addressing timeliness, and the record of prior proceedings, the Court determines that the United States Attorney should file a response to Petitioner's Motion to Amend. The Court will direct that the United States file an Answer or other responsive pleading in this case within sixty (60) days from entry of this Order.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that no later than sixty (60) days from entry of this Order, the United States Attorney shall file an Answer or other responsive pleading to Petitioner's Motion to Amend.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer