Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Carroll v. U.S., 5:16-cr-00046-FDW-DSC-2. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20190528a78 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 23, 2019
Latest Update: May 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . UPON MOTION of the Government [Doc. 4] for enlargement of time within which to file a response to Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255, and for good cause shown, AND UPON MOTION of the Petitioner [Doc. 6] for an enlargement of time within which to file a Reply to the Government's Response Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Government's moti
More

ORDER

UPON MOTION of the Government [Doc. 4] for enlargement of time within which to file a response to Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and for good cause shown,

AND UPON MOTION of the Petitioner [Doc. 6] for an enlargement of time within which to file a Reply to the Government's Response Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Government's motion will be granted and the Response [Doc. 5] filed on April 30, 2019 is deemed timely filed,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order in which to file a Reply.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:

(1) Government's motion for an extension of time [Doc. 4] is GRANTED and the Government's Response [Doc. 5] is deemed timely filed. (2) Petitioner's motion for an extension of time [Doc. 6] is GRANTED and the Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order in which to file a Reply to the Government's Response to Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer