United States v. Gilliam, 3:09-cr-97-MOC-DCK-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20191220e69
Visitors: 26
Filed: Dec. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Letter, docketed as a "Motion Requesting a Copy of Back and Forth Correspondence Between Prosecutor and Attorney." (#17). Defendant is represented by court-appointed counsel in this matter. 1 Under L.Cr.R. 47.1(g), the Court typically does not entertain pro se motions by parties who are already ably represented by counsel. Defendant is encouraged to consult with his counsel about filing
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Letter, docketed as a "Motion Requesting a Copy of Back and Forth Correspondence Between Prosecutor and Attorney." (#17). Defendant is represented by court-appointed counsel in this matter. 1 Under L.Cr.R. 47.1(g), the Court typically does not entertain pro se motions by parties who are already ably represented by counsel. Defendant is encouraged to consult with his counsel about filing ..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant's pro se Letter, docketed as a "Motion Requesting a Copy of Back and Forth Correspondence Between Prosecutor and Attorney." (#17).
Defendant is represented by court-appointed counsel in this matter.1 Under L.Cr.R. 47.1(g), the Court typically does not entertain pro se motions by parties who are already ably represented by counsel. Defendant is encouraged to consult with his counsel about filing any appropriate motions on his behalf, and the Court will gladly hear any motion defendant's counsel makes on his behalf. Having thus considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's pro se Letter, docketed as a "Motion Requesting a Copy of Back and Forth Correspondence Between Prosecutor and Attorney," (#17) is DENIED without prejudice.
FootNotes
1. Defendant has a pending Motion for Inquiry of Counsel, which has been referred to the U.S. Magistrate Judge for hearing, but he is still represented by counsel at this time.
Source: Leagle
