Filed: Dec. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 22, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT PATRICIA MINALDI , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the two Reports and Recommendations (Rec. Docs. 72, 73) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and determining that the findings are correct under applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant, Heather West's Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 27) is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's claims against West are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDIC
Summary: JUDGMENT PATRICIA MINALDI , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the two Reports and Recommendations (Rec. Docs. 72, 73) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and determining that the findings are correct under applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the defendant, Heather West's Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 27) is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's claims against West are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE..
More
JUDGMENT
PATRICIA MINALDI, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the two Reports and Recommendations (Rec. Docs. 72, 73) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and determining that the findings are correct under applicable law,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant, Heather West's Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 27) is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's claims against West are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 19) filed by Darlene Burns and Leslie James is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's claims against Burns and James are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. Doc. 38) filed by Aaron Barbee and Bobby Stanley is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's claims against Barbee and Stanley are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because all claims have been disposed of, the complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of the defendants' Motions for Costs (Rec. Docs. 19, 27, 38) are DENIED.