U.S. v. MENDEZ, 16-6140. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20160426126
Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2016
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Raphael Mendez appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remove his attorney. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-00350-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Raphael Mendez appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remove his attorney. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-00350-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Raphael Mendez appeals the district court's order denying his motion to remove his attorney. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mendez, No. 5:91-hc-00350-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
