TAYLOR v. DANIELS, 3:14-cv-79-FDW. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150128e75
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2015
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Pro Se Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. No. 26), filed on January 23, 2015. On August 15, 2014, this Court granted summary judgment to Respondent in this action, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Doc. No. 17). The Clerk entered Judgment on the same day. (Doc. No. 18). Because the Court has already dismissed this action, the Court will deny the pending motion as moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that P
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Pro Se Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. No. 26), filed on January 23, 2015. On August 15, 2014, this Court granted summary judgment to Respondent in this action, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Doc. No. 17). The Clerk entered Judgment on the same day. (Doc. No. 18). Because the Court has already dismissed this action, the Court will deny the pending motion as moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Pe..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Petitioner's Pro Se Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. No. 26), filed on January 23, 2015.
On August 15, 2014, this Court granted summary judgment to Respondent in this action, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 17). The Clerk entered Judgment on the same day. (Doc. No. 18). Because the Court has already dismissed this action, the Court will deny the pending motion as moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Pro Se Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. No. 26), is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
