Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ZERNHEL v. COLVIN, 3:13-CV-00963. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio Number: infdco20140430725 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NANCY A. VECCHIARELLI, Magistrate Judge. This case is before the Magistrate Judge by the consent of the parties. (Doc. No. 14.) On February 28, 2014, Plaintiff, Coreena M. Zernhel, through her attorney, Mary T. Meadows, filed a motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d), in the amount of $2,847.60. (Application for Attorney Fees ("EAJA Application"), Doc. No. 22.) The Commissioner did not file any opposition to the
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NANCY A. VECCHIARELLI, Magistrate Judge.

This case is before the Magistrate Judge by the consent of the parties. (Doc. No. 14.) On February 28, 2014, Plaintiff, Coreena M. Zernhel, through her attorney, Mary T. Meadows, filed a motion for attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $2,847.60. (Application for Attorney Fees ("EAJA Application"), Doc. No. 22.) The Commissioner did not file any opposition to the EAJA Motion.

On March 25, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Proposed Stipulation to an Award of Fees under the EAJA in the amount of $2,682.86. (Doc. No. 25.) The Court finds the stipulated amount to be reasonable. Therefore, the Court awards Plaintiff $2,682.86 in attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA. This award shall satisfy all of Plaintiff's claims for fees and expenses under 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

The parties' stipulation is not clear regarding the issue of the identity of the payee of the check for the attorney fees in this case. In one paragraph, the stipulation reads, "The Court shall order that the awarded attorney fees be made payable to Plaintiff ... and delivered to the business address of Plaintiff's counsel." (Doc. No. 25 at 1.) However, the next paragraph provides that the identity of the payee depends on whether Plaintiff has any outstanding federal debt: If Plaintiff has no outstanding federal debt, the stipulation requires the Commissioner to make the check payable to Plaintiff's counsel, rather than to Plaintiff. (Id. at 1-2.) Under the terms of this later paragraph, the check shall be payable to Plaintiff only if she has outstanding federal debt. (Id. at 2.) In that case, the stipulation requires the Commissioner to make the check payable to Plaintiff, for the amount remaining after subtracting the amount of Plaintiff's federal debt. (Id. at 2.)

The Court finds, based on past practice and in order to ensure the fairest result to all parties involved, that the parties intended to stipulate to the scenario set forth in the later paragraph of the stipulation. Accordingly, if counsel for the parties can verify that Plaintiff owes no pre-existing debts to the United States that are subject to offset, the Commissioner shall direct that the award be made payable to Plaintiff's counsel subject to the assignment signed by Plaintiff and her counsel, and that the Treasury Department mail any check in this matter to the business address of Plaintiff's counsel. If Plaintiff owes a pre-existing federal debt subject to offset, the Commissioner shall direct that the check be made payable directly to Plaintiff, in an amount equaling the balance of the stipulated attorney fees remaining after subtracting the amount of Plaintiff's outstanding federal debt, and mailed to the business address of Plaintiff's counsel. If Plaintiff's outstanding federal debt exceeds the amount of the stipulated attorney fees, the stipulated amount shall be used to offset Plaintiff's federal debt and no attorney fees shall be paid.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer