HILL v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, 1:09cv800. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120719968
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2012
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 8, 2012 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 36). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 8, 2012 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 36). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc...
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on March 8, 2012 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 36). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 37).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, Defendant Krauser's motion to dismiss (Doc. 32) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling in state court. This case is hereby TERMINATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
