USA v. Colquitt, 3:09-cr-109. (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20171206824
Visitors: 10
Filed: Nov. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2017
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC. #187); OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC. #186); CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED ON DOCKET WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . Based on the reasoning set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz in his Report and Recommendations, Doc. #187, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the appli
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC. #187); OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC. #186); CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED ON DOCKET WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . Based on the reasoning set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz in his Report and Recommendations, Doc. #187, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applic..
More
DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC. #187); OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (DOC. #186); CASE TO REMAIN TERMINATED ON DOCKET
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
Based on the reasoning set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz in his Report and Recommendations, Doc. #187, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, the Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety, and OVERRULES Defendant's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, Doc. #186.
The Court notes that, although Defendant was notified of his right to file Objections to the Report and Recommendations, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no Objections have been filed within the time allotted.
The above-captioned case shall remain terminated on the Court's docket.
Source: Leagle
