Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Leffers v. Woodbridge, 3:18-cv-408. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20191021b29 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) DISMISSING THIS CASE WITH PREJUDICE; AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET MICHAEL J. NEWMAN , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having been advised that the above-captioned matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to all parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within forty-five (45) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Within forty-five (45) days, the p
More

ORDER AND ENTRY: (1) DISMISSING THIS CASE WITH PREJUDICE; AND (2) TERMINATING THIS CASE ON THE COURT'S DOCKET

The Court, having been advised that the above-captioned matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to all parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within forty-five (45) days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Within forty-five (45) days, the parties may move to substitute this Order and Entry with a proposed dismissal entry agreed upon by the parties. Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381-82 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer