U.S. v. HARDEN, 3:03-cr-17(2). (2017)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20170324i05
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 175), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant'
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 175), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (ECF No. 175), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's § 2255 Motion (ECF No. 165) be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Source: Leagle
