Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Social Language Processing, Inc. v. Ott, 5:13-CV-401(DNH/DEP). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. New York Number: infdco20160331i29 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 30, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 30, 2016
Summary: DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD , District Judge . Pro se plaintiff Social Language Processing, Inc. commenced this action on April 10, 2013, against defendants Myle Ott, Jeffery T. Hancock and Claire Cardie, alleging breach of defendants' fiduciary duty. Social Language, a corporation, is not represented by counsel as is required by the well-established law of this District. For that reason, on March 1, 2016, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Repo
More

DECISION and ORDER

Pro se plaintiff Social Language Processing, Inc. commenced this action on April 10, 2013, against defendants Myle Ott, Jeffery T. Hancock and Claire Cardie, alleging breach of defendants' fiduciary duty. Social Language, a corporation, is not represented by counsel as is required by the well-established law of this District. For that reason, on March 1, 2016, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed.

Thus, based upon a de novo review of the Report-Recommendation, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is ORDERED that:

Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED (ECF No. 1), and

The Clerk serve a copy of this Order on plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer