USA v. Player, 3:17-CR-213-MOC-DCK. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180208b95
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the handwritten note by the Defendant, which the Court construes as a " Pro Se Motion For Return Of Property/Pretrial" (Document No. 33) filed February 6, 2018. The undersigned notes that Defendant is represented by appointed counsel, Richard L. Brown, Jr. It is the practice of the Court that when a Defendant is represented by counsel, all motions should be filed through counsel of record. IT IS THEREFORE ORD
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the handwritten note by the Defendant, which the Court construes as a " Pro Se Motion For Return Of Property/Pretrial" (Document No. 33) filed February 6, 2018. The undersigned notes that Defendant is represented by appointed counsel, Richard L. Brown, Jr. It is the practice of the Court that when a Defendant is represented by counsel, all motions should be filed through counsel of record. IT IS THEREFORE ORDE..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the handwritten note by the Defendant, which the Court construes as a "Pro Se Motion For Return Of Property/Pretrial" (Document No. 33) filed February 6, 2018. The undersigned notes that Defendant is represented by appointed counsel, Richard L. Brown, Jr. It is the practice of the Court that when a Defendant is represented by counsel, all motions should be filed through counsel of record.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the "Pro Se Motion For Return Of Property/Pretrial" (Document No. 33) is hereby DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant may re-file his motion, if desired, through his counsel, Richard L. Brown, Jr.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
