BROWN v. LIMOUSINES, 2:09-CV-01306-PMP-RJJ. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120207a60
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Before the Court for consideration is Defendant's fully briefed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #19) filed December 21, 2011. Although Plaintiff filed a "Response" to Defendant's Motion, in the form of a one paragraph letter (Doc. #22), Plaintiff fails to respond adequately to the arguments advanced in Defendant's Motion. As argued in Defendant's Reply Memorandum (Doc. #23), Plaintiff provides no evidence in her response to support her claims, much less
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. Before the Court for consideration is Defendant's fully briefed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #19) filed December 21, 2011. Although Plaintiff filed a "Response" to Defendant's Motion, in the form of a one paragraph letter (Doc. #22), Plaintiff fails to respond adequately to the arguments advanced in Defendant's Motion. As argued in Defendant's Reply Memorandum (Doc. #23), Plaintiff provides no evidence in her response to support her claims, much less ..
More
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is Defendant's fully briefed Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #19) filed December 21, 2011.
Although Plaintiff filed a "Response" to Defendant's Motion, in the form of a one paragraph letter (Doc. #22), Plaintiff fails to respond adequately to the arguments advanced in Defendant's Motion. As argued in Defendant's Reply Memorandum (Doc. #23), Plaintiff provides no evidence in her response to support her claims, much less to raise a genuine issue of material fact. Under the circumstances the Court finds Defendant is clearly entitled to the relief requested.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #19) is GRANTED and that the Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter judgment in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff.
Source: Leagle
