ORDER

GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge's March 29, 2016 Order and Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 42.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant in part and deny in part the October 19, 2015 Motion to Dismiss of Served Defendants. (ECF No. 23.) Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny the motion in regard to Defendants Eddy, Yost, Rannes, Neufeld, Oppy, Magnuson, and Curtiss in connection with Plaintiff's claim for the denial of medical and dental care. The Magistrate Judge also recommended that this Court then grant the motion to dismiss in all other respects.

The Order and Report and Recommendation advised the parties that the failure to file a timely objection would "result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court." (ECF No. 42, at Page ID # 316.) No objections have been filed, the time for filing objections has expired, and the Magistrate Judge's reasoning is correct. The Court therefore ADOPTS the Order and Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 42), DENIES the motion to dismiss in regard to Defendants Eddy, Yost, Rannes, Neufeld, Oppy, Magnuson, and Curtiss in connection with Plaintiff's claim for the denial of medical and dental care (ECF No. 23), and GRANTS the motion in all other respects (Id.).

IT IS SO ORDERED.