DIAMOND FALLS ESTATES, LLC v. NANTAHALA BANK & TRUST COMPANY, 2:14cv7. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150402883
Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are the Motions for Extension of Time [# 87, # 88 & # 89]. Defendant Nantahala Bank & Trust Company ("Defendant") requests a brief extension of time to file a summary judgment motion and to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is currently due April 1, 2015. Plaintiffs object to the requested extension. Upon a review of the record, the motions, and considering
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court are the Motions for Extension of Time [# 87, # 88 & # 89]. Defendant Nantahala Bank & Trust Company ("Defendant") requests a brief extension of time to file a summary judgment motion and to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is currently due April 1, 2015. Plaintiffs object to the requested extension. Upon a review of the record, the motions, and considering ..
More
ORDER
DENNIS L. HOWELL, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court are the Motions for Extension of Time [# 87, # 88 & # 89]. Defendant Nantahala Bank & Trust Company ("Defendant") requests a brief extension of time to file a summary judgment motion and to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is currently due April 1, 2015. Plaintiffs object to the requested extension.
Upon a review of the record, the motions, and considering Plaintiffs' objections to the extension, the Court finds that Defendant has demonstrated good cause for granting the brief extension of time. The Court GRANTS the motions [# 87, # 88 & # 89]. Defendant shall have until April 10, 2015, to file its summary judgment motion and to file a response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [# 77].
Source: Leagle