BROOKS v. ARMARK FOOD CORPORATION, 1:14cv592. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150129h28
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on August 20, 2014 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9).
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on August 20, 2014 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9). ..
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on August 20, 2014 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2).
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will not be taken in good faith, therefor denying plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601 (6th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
