Singfield v. Cardaras, 2:15-cv-2842. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160513849
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , Chief District Judge . On March 21, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in this case recommending that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be granted and that this action be dismissed (ECF No. 16). The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that failure to object within fourteen days would result in a waiver of review. The time period for objections has run and no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly,
Summary: ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr. , Chief District Judge . On March 21, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in this case recommending that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be granted and that this action be dismissed (ECF No. 16). The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that failure to object within fourteen days would result in a waiver of review. The time period for objections has run and no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, t..
More
ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, Jr., Chief District Judge.
On March 21, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in this case recommending that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be granted and that this action be dismissed (ECF No. 16). The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that failure to object within fourteen days would result in a waiver of review. The time period for objections has run and no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and this action is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
