Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rotex Global, LLC v. Gerard Daniel Worldwide, Inc., 1:17-CV-2118 (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20171201e08 Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2017
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2017, following the status conference with counsel of record in the above-captioned matter on today's date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The case management order (Doc. 16) is VACATED. 2. As a result of the court's preferences expressed during the status conference, and in consideration of plaintiff Rotex Global, LLC's ("Rotex") motion (Doc. 43) for claims construction: a. Rotex shall file a supple
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2017, following the status conference with counsel of record in the above-captioned matter on today's date, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The case management order (Doc. 16) is VACATED. 2. As a result of the court's preferences expressed during the status conference, and in consideration of plaintiff Rotex Global, LLC's ("Rotex") motion (Doc. 43) for claims construction: a. Rotex shall file a supplemental brief on the issue of claims construction on or before Tuesday, January 2, 2018. b. Defendant Gerard Daniel Worldwide, Inc. ("Gerard Daniel") shall file a responsive brief on the issue of claims construction on or before Friday, February 2, 2018. c. Rotex's motion (Doc. 55) requesting a claims construction hearing is DISMISSED without prejudice. On or before Friday, February 9, 2018, the parties shall file a joint status report advising the court of their respective positions on the necessity of a claims construction hearing. 3. Gerard Daniel's motion (Doc. 20) for summary judgment shall be held in abeyance pending the conclusion of the proceedings outlined in paragraph 2. 4. All discovery regarding damages is SUSPENDED pending resolution of liability issues. However, the fact of this suspension shall not prevent either party from serving written discovery requests on the subject of damages. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may respond to discovery requests on the subject of damages. 5. The court will enter an appropriate protective order taking into consideration the concerns of all counsel. The court hereby directs that questions or concerns regarding the improper disclosure of confidential information be submitted to the court for prompt resolution. Motions concerning improper disclosure of confidential information may be filed under seal and shall be addressed by the court with dispatch.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer