Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

WILLIAMS v. FORBES, 3:12-cv-00838-MOC-DSC. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20140619a77 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants' motions for summary judgment and non-party Dewitt F. McCarley's Motion to Quash Subpoena. The court has fully considered the motions for summary judgment and has done extensive work toward resolving those motions. However, before deciding those motions, the court will conduct a brief hearing at which it will listen to the audio tapes of any 911 calls, recorded dispatch traffic, and the Officer's DMVR. De
More

ORDER

MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants' motions for summary judgment and non-party Dewitt F. McCarley's Motion to Quash Subpoena. The court has fully considered the motions for summary judgment and has done extensive work toward resolving those motions. However, before deciding those motions, the court will conduct a brief hearing at which it will listen to the audio tapes of any 911 calls, recorded dispatch traffic, and the Officer's DMVR. Defendants will be responsible for assembling such material, having transcripts that track such recordings, and having the audio ready to play at calendar call. After hearing such material the court will have a brief discussion with counsel concerning the merits of the dispositive motions and then make its decision. If the action survives, the court will resolve the Motion to Quash and then move on to selection of a jury.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' motions for summary judgment (#50 & #54) and Dewitt F. McCarley's Motion to Quash Motion (#105) are scheduled for such further proceedings as herein provided at calendar call.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer