KELLY v. HELLING, 3:13-cv-00551-RCJ-WGC. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20140714a94
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. This case arises out of alleged retaliation against a correctional officer by his superiors based on his protected speech. Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21). Shortly before Defendants filed the present motion, Plaintiff's counsel was suspended by the Nevada Supreme Court. The Court will therefore give Plaintiff sixty (60) days to: (1) associate substitute counsel or inform the Court that he will proceed in pro se; and
Summary: ORDER ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge. This case arises out of alleged retaliation against a correctional officer by his superiors based on his protected speech. Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21). Shortly before Defendants filed the present motion, Plaintiff's counsel was suspended by the Nevada Supreme Court. The Court will therefore give Plaintiff sixty (60) days to: (1) associate substitute counsel or inform the Court that he will proceed in pro se; and (..
More
ORDER
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
This case arises out of alleged retaliation against a correctional officer by his superiors based on his protected speech. Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21). Shortly before Defendants filed the present motion, Plaintiff's counsel was suspended by the Nevada Supreme Court. The Court will therefore give Plaintiff sixty (60) days to: (1) associate substitute counsel or inform the Court that he will proceed in pro se; and (2) respond to the motion.
CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days from the entry of this Order into the electronic docket to respond to the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have sixty (60) days from the entry of this Order into the electronic docket to associate substitute counsel or notify the Court that he will proceed in pro se.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' counsel shall serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
