Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. CLARK, 3:10-cv-406 (2012)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20120716b64 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jul. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 13, 2012
Summary: DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #1245) IN ITS ENTIRETY; DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 US.C. 2255; TERMINATION ENTRY WALTER HERBERT RICE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the May 18,2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #1245), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such ob
More

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. #1245) IN ITS ENTIRETY; DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 US.C. § 2255; TERMINATION ENTRY

WALTER HERBERT RICE, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the May 18,2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (Doc. #1245), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) has expired, the Court adopts the aforesaid Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

Defendant's Motion to Vacate Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. #1187) is denied. If Defendant appeals this decision to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, he is denied a certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer