THOMAS v. LAKE COUNTY, 1:13-cv-852-CL. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20150114h92
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). After review, I agree with the Report and Recommendation that Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted. CONCLUSIO
Summary: ORDER OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd. , 700 F.2d 1202 , 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). After review, I agree with the Report and Recommendation that Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted. CONCLUSION..
More
ORDER
OWEN M. PANNER, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). After review, I agree with the Report and Recommendation that Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted.
CONCLUSION
Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#53) is adopted. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (#26) is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
