TAYLOR v. HILL, 3:10-CV-00105-AC. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20130212803
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 08, 2013
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2013
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#41) on November 28, 2012, in which he recommends the Court deny Defendant's Amended Petition (#20) for Writ of Habeas Corpus and enter a judgment dismissing the case with prejudice. This matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The parties did not file any objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The Court, therefor
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#41) on November 28, 2012, in which he recommends the Court deny Defendant's Amended Petition (#20) for Writ of Habeas Corpus and enter a judgment dismissing the case with prejudice. This matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The parties did not file any objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The Court, therefore..
More
ORDER
ANNA J. BROWN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation (#41) on November 28, 2012, in which he recommends the Court deny Defendant's Amended Petition (#20) for Writ of Habeas Corpus and enter a judgment dismissing the case with prejudice. This matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
The parties did not file any objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The Court, therefore, is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo as to these portions of the Findings and Recommendation. Shiny Rock Min. Corp v. U.S., 825 F.2d 216, 218. (9th Cir. 1987). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#41) and, accordingly, DENIES Defendant's Amended petition (#20) for Writ of Habeas Corpus and DISMISSES this case with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
