PESHEK EX REL. N.R. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:13 CV 01854. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20141105b17
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION LESLEY WELLS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") advising that the Court affirm the ALJ's decision and dismiss the instant case with prejudice. (Doc. 21). No timely objections have been filed. This Court, having reviewed the R&R and found it to be without error, adopts it as its own. 1 Therefore, the ALJ's decision is affirme
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION LESLEY WELLS, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") advising that the Court affirm the ALJ's decision and dismiss the instant case with prejudice. (Doc. 21). No timely objections have been filed. This Court, having reviewed the R&R and found it to be without error, adopts it as its own. 1 Therefore, the ALJ's decision is affirmed..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
LESLEY WELLS, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on United States Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") advising that the Court affirm the ALJ's decision and dismiss the instant case with prejudice. (Doc. 21). No timely objections have been filed. This Court, having reviewed the R&R and found it to be without error, adopts it as its own.1
Therefore, the ALJ's decision is affirmed and this matter is dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which a timely objection is made. "When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note.
Source: Leagle
