Smith v. U.S., 2:14-cr-176. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180906d97
Visitors: 56
Filed: Sep. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On June 11, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 be dismissed. EOF No. 132. Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The R&R, EOF No. 132, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED . The Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On June 11, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 be dismissed. EOF No. 132. Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The R&R, EOF No. 132, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED . The Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255,..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
On June 11, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be dismissed. EOF No. 132. Although the parties were advised of the right to file objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.
The R&R, EOF No. 132, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, EOF No. 115, is hereby DISMISSED.
Petitioner has waived his right to file an appeal by failing to file objections. See Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). The Court therefore DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
